Shakir Wahib (dariKiri),
Abu Wahib, seorang pemimpin Negara Islam Iraq dan Levant (ISIL) berdiri di
sebelah kereta yang terbakar, di lokasi yang tidak didedahkan di Iraq (Shakir
Wahib (L), Abu Wahib, a leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant
(ISIL) standing next to burning cars, at an undisclosed location in Iraq (AFP Photo/HO)
Srikandi גבורה - Kemajuan
penuh kegilaan militan ISIS di Iraq tlh mendorong beberapa senator Amerika Syarikat
untuk memanggil untuk kempen pengeboman baru terhadap jihad dan untuk kerajaan
Iraq Perdana Menteri Nouri al-Maliki meletak jawatan.
Senator
Amerika Dianne Feinstein dan John McCain menyeru untuk Amerika Syarikat untuk
campur tangan sekali lagi, kali ini untuk mengebom kumpulan pengganas ISIS yang
telah menawan 'captured' satu siri bandar-bandar Iraq berturut-turut pesat dan membunuh
semua orang 'kill everyone' yg mereka anggap sebagai risiko keselamatan.
Menurut
laporan baru oleh Pusat Kemajuan Amerika (CAP), Amerika Syarikat perlu
"bersedia untuk operasi counterterrorism terhad terhadap ISIS, termasuk
serangan udara mungkin."
"Saya
rasa yang paling penting ialah kita mengambil tindakan langsung kini terhadap
ISIS, berarak ke Baghdad, dan menghalang mereka dari masuk ke Baghdad,"
kata Feinstein (D-CAL), pengerusi Jawatankuasa Perisikan Senat.
Arizona
Senator John McCain juga menyokong idea serangan udara. Selepas Presiden
Amerika Syarikat, Barack Obama mengumumkan penghantaran kerahan 'deployment' 275 anggota tentera ke
Iraq untuk menyediakan keselamatan untuk Kedutaan Amerika Syarikat di Baghdad
terhadap pemberontak Sunni, McCain berkata kebimbangan beliau adalah "sama
ada kita akan berbuat apa-apa selain menghantar beberapa marin tam-bahan, yang
memenangi membuat apa-apa, "katanya.
Kedua-dua
Feinstein dan McCain juga mempertahankan keperluan perubahan rejim di Baghdad,
menuduh kerajaan pemangku PM Nouri al-Maliki daripada ketidakupayaan untuk
membendung pemberontakan Islam di negara ini.
US SENATORs: Let’s bomb IRAQ (again . . .)!!!
The
frenzied advance of ISIS militants in Iraq has prompted some US senators to
call for a new bombing campaign against the jihadists and for the Iraqi government
of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki to step down.
American
senators Dianne Feinstein and John McCain are calling for the US to step in
again, this time to bomb the groups of ISIS terrorists who have captured a
series of Iraqi cities in rapid succession and to kill
everyone they regard as
a security risk.
According
to a new report by the Center for American Progress (CAP), the US should
“prepare for limited counterterrorism operations against ISIS, including
possible air strikes.”
“I
think most important is that we take direct action now against ISIS, marching
down to Baghdad, and prevent them from getting into Baghdad,” said Feinstein
(D-CAL), the chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
Arizona
Senator John McCain also supports the idea of air strikes. After US President
Barack Obama announced the deployment of 275 troops to Iraq to provide security
for the US Embassy in Baghdad against Sunni insurgents, McCain said that his
concern is “whether we’re going to do anything besides send a few extra
marines, which won’t do anything," he said.
Both
Feinstein and McCain also defend the necessity of regime change in Baghdad,
accusing the acting government of PM Nouri al-Maliki of an inability to curb
the Islamist insurgency in the country.
US Senator John McCain
(R-AZ) (L) dan Amerika Syarikat Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (U.S. Senator
John McCain (R-AZ) (L) and U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (Reuters/Win
McNamee)
Parlimen
Iraq meluluskan al-Maliki untuk masa jawatan kedua sebagai bermastautin Perdana
Menteri pada Disember 2010. Sekarang Feinstein mahukan beliau meletak jawatan,
diganti dengan "perdamaian" kerajaan.
"Saya
fikir ia adalah yang paling penting bahawa kerajaan Maliki diganti, dan yang
termasuk Encik Maliki, dgn kerajaan perdamaian," kata Feinstein, sambil
menambah: "Berdasarkan kepada semua yang saya dengar, baca dan tahu, Encik
Maliki tidak dapat untuk membawa perdamaian di negara itu. "
Pentadbiran
Obama perlu menghantar wakil-wakil ke Baghdad untuk "bekerja dengan Maliki
dan beritahu dia dia mendapat ke langkah ke bawah dan mempunyai kerajaan
campuran," kata McCain, bersetuju dengan idea al-Maliki meletak jawatan.
Pusat
pagar untuk Kemajuan Amerika, sebuah organisasi dengan hubungan rapat dengan
Rumah Putih, telah menggesa pentadbiran Obama untuk melindungi Iraq dari
kehancuran dan melancarkan kempen ketenteraan terhadap ISIS dan kumpulan
pelampau lain.
Garis
keras diambil oleh ahli parlimen Amerika agresif muncul bertepatan dengan
talian sama-sama keras yang sedang diusahakan oleh kerajaan Arab Saudi. Monarki
mutlak Sunni di Riyadh sentiasa menjadi lawan terbesar semua rejim Syiah Islam
di Timur Tengah, dari Syria Bashar Assad, atau Iraq al-Maliki.
Itulah
sebabnya Riyadh kekal sebagai penaja utama bukan sahaja kumpulan jihad ISIS,
tetapi ramai kumpulan jihad radikal lain dalam kedua-dua yang dilanda perang
Iraq dan Syria.
Namun
tidak semua ahli parlimen Amerika untuk menerapkan idea dari yang ke-3 kempen
ketenteraan Amerika Syarikat di Iraq.
Maine
Republikan Senator Susan Collins mempersoalkan bahawa "serangan udara akan
bekerja," menyatakan idea umum bahawa jika NATO adalah di Iraq, ISIS tidak
akan menjadi masalah di sana.
Bekas
Ahli Kongres Ron Paul mengutuk ‘condemned’
dasar luar White House semasa, letupan Presiden Barack Obama lebih campur
tangan Amerika Syarikat mungkin di Iraq.
"Mereka
tidak boleh mengakui mereka salah tentang serangan orang menjadi 'cakewalk'
yang akan membayar untuk dirinya sendiri, jadi mereka mahu menyalahkan
peristiwa minggu lepas pada 2011 pengeluaran Amerika Syarikat dari Iraq. Tetapi masalah ini
bermula dengan serangan 2003 itu sendiri, bukan 2011 pengeluaran tentera.
Sesiapa yang memahami sebab dan akibat daripada memahaminya, "Paul
menulis.
Minggu
lepas, Menteri Luar Rusia Sergey Lavrov berkata ‘said’ Iraq semakin meningkat di luar kawalan adalah
hasil daripada pencerobohan yang dilakukan oleh Amerika Syarikat dan United
Kingdom pada tahun 2003.
Lavrov
berkata bahawa 11 tahun lalu, selepas Presiden Amerika Syarikat George Bush
mengumumkan kemenangan demokrasi di Iraq, "keadaan telah merosot dlm
perkem-bangan geometri."
"Perpaduan
Iraq telah dipersoalkan," kata Lavrov. "The keganasan berleluasa
sedang berlaku kerana bahawa pasukan pendudukan tdk membayar apa-apa
perhatian kepada proses politik dalaman, tdk membantu dialog nasional, &
hanya mengejar kepentingan mereka sendiri."
Iraq’s
parliament approved al-Maliki for a second term as prime minister resident in
December 2010. Now Feinstein wants him to step down, to be replaced with a
“reconciliation” government.
“I
think it’s most important that the Maliki government be replaced, and that
includes Mr. Maliki, with a reconciliation government,” Feinstein said, adding:
“Based on all I’ve heard, read and know, Mr. Maliki is not able to bring about
reconciliation in that country.”
The
Obama administration should send representatives to Baghdad to “work with
Maliki and tell him he’s got to step down and have a coalition government,”
McCain said, agreeing with the idea of al-Maliki stepping down.
The
centrist Center for American Progress, an organization with close ties to the
White House, has urged the Obama administration to protect Iraq from
disintegration and to mount a military campaign against ISIS and other
extremist groups.
The
hard line taken by hawkish American lawmakers appears to coincide with an
equally hard line being pursued by the Saudi Arabian government. The Sunni
absolute monarchy in Riyadh has always been the biggest opponent of all Shia
Muslim regimes in the Middle East, from Bashar Assad’s Syria or al-Maliki’s
Iraq.
That’s
why Riyadh remains the main sponsor of not only the ISIS jihadist group, but
many other radical jihadist groups in both war-torn Iraq and Syria.
Yet not
all American lawmakers are ready to embrace the idea of a third US military
campaign in Iraq.
Maine
Republican Senator Susan Collins questioned that “air strikes would work,”
expressing the general idea that if NATO was in Iraq, ISIS would not be a
problem there.
Former
Congressman Ron Paul condemned
the current White House’s foreign policy, blasting President Barack Obama over
a possible US intervention in Iraq.
“They
cannot admit they were wrong about the invasion being a ‘cakewalk’ that would
pay for itself, so they want to blame last week’s events on the 2011 US
withdrawal from Iraq. But the trouble started with the 2003 invasion itself,
not the 2011 troop withdrawal. Anyone who understands cause and effect should
understand this,” Paul wrote.
Last
week, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov
said Iraq spiraling out of control is the result of the invasion
carried out by the US and the UK in 2003.
Lavrov
noted that 11 years ago, after US President George Bush announced the victory
of democracy in Iraq, “the situation has deteriorated in geometrical
progression.”
“The
unity of Iraq has been called into question,” Lavrov said. “The rampant
terrorism is taking place due to the fact that the occupation troops didn’t pay
any attention to the interior political processes, didn’t help the national
dialogue, and only pursued their own interests.”
READ
MORE: http://on.rt.com/heitln